2 ms·
I can understand this, but only in shops that don't have on-staff Linux people. My company is rather Mac heavy, but we run Linux fileservers. Way more bang-for
by teilo 15y ago
I can understand this, but only in shops that don't have on-staff Linux people.
My company is rather Mac heavy, but we run Linux fileservers. Way more bang-for-the-buck.
That said, there are still problems: poor AFP performance when fetching directory listings from a large filesystem, and the necessity of using resource-fork-aware mv,rm,mkdir, etc., commands when on the Linux shell, in order to preserve metadata and resource forks.
- duskwuff 15y ago> … and the necessity of using resource-fork-aware mv,rm,mkdir, etc., commands when on the Linux shell, in order to preserve metadata and resource forks. What still uses resource forks? I can't speak for your company, but the only files with resource forks I still have around are historical curiosities. Modern OS X apps generally don't use them at all.