Technically it’s not illegal is a big deal when the law in question is the 1st amendment of the US constitution. Moderation is the exercise of free speech by t

Technically it’s not illegal is a big deal when the law in question is the 1st amendment of the US constitution. Moderation is the exercise of free speech by the companies. It is government regulation of their moderation policies that would be censorship and violation of their first amendment rights. Should the government be able to force Twitter, Facebook, or you personal blog to carry spam ads for “natural male enhancement” pills under force of law? Again, what you are advocating for are penalties levied against private enterprises by the government. I do not understand how this is a better than the status quo where someone is banned from a website and faces absolutely no legal repercussions. Please help me understand.