You need to go back and look at the statement he made. He never says anything to the effect of "you can't prove a negative". Or "we scoured everything and cou

You need to go back and look at the statement he made. He never says anything to the effect of "you can't prove a negative". Or "we scoured everything and could find no evidence whatsoever, but still doesn't mean that there might have been something he dud". No, immediately following the statement about "we would have said so", he goes into -- "a current president can not be charged with a federal crime ...". He then goes on to say that he was bound by this property. That's an odd next statement for someone you think is innocent, but just can't prove a negative. With a new attorney general and Trump about to no longer be an an active President, we may revisit this.