A bit of an odd letter, since Warner’s letter isn’t asking for documents but rather establishing a “duty to preserve” [1] due to high likelihood of impending li

A bit of an odd letter, since Warner’s letter isn’t asking for documents but rather establishing a “duty to preserve” [1] due to high likelihood of impending litigation. IIUC, the senator’s letter is about all that can be done while the Senate is not in session. Insurrections are not protected free speech, and Gab may have liability. No doubt this will be litigated, and if Gab were to delete content now (as opposed to removing access), this might constitute obstruction of justice. [1] https://www.kramerlevin.com/images/content/2/5/v4/2562/Reasonable-20Anticipation-20of-20Litigation-20Under-20FRCP-2037-e-20Triggers-20and-20Limits.pdf https://www.kramerlevin.com/images/content/2/5/v4/2562/Reaso...