>The fact that the congressman speaking does not mean his statement deoes extrapolate for the entirety of congress. Did we hear other arguments on front of the

>The fact that the congressman speaking does not mean his statement deoes extrapolate for the entirety of congress. Did we hear other arguments on front of the Chairman against said protection ? Given that Chris Cox (the congressman quoted) co-sponsored and co-wrote section 230 with Ron Wyden, his take on what it was all about is absolutely relevant, as is the fact that there was a competing bill that when finally passed, incorporated section 230. A piece of unsolicited advice: Learn some history, friend.