3 ms·
"I hadn't heard of Chrome Frame until this discussion" > Google I/O 2011 - http://www.google.com/events/io/2011/sessions/html5-today-with-google-chrome-frame.h
by jabo 15y ago
"I hadn't heard of Chrome Frame until this discussion"
> Google I/O 2011 - http://www.google.com/events/io/2011/sessions/html5-today-with-google-chrome-frame.html http://www.google.com/events/io/2011/sessions/html5-today-wi...
> Google I/O 2010 - http://www.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/using-chrome-frame.html http://www.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/using-chrome-f...
"at least they make it reasonably straightforward for sysadmins to manage policies across a whole workplace."
> Google recently came up Administrative templates for Chrome. But I wonder why they didn't push it enough to IT departments - http://www.google.com/support/installer/bin/answer.py?answer=146164#Technical_Overview http://www.google.com/support/installer/bin/answer.py?answer...
- Silhouette 15y agoI appreciate the links from a personal perspective, but they don't seem to contradict the advice on the Google Chrome Frame project page I mentioned, which actually suggests redirecting users to an installation page if they visit your site in IE and don't already have GCF installed. That sort of tactic is usually associated with either malware or the 1990s where I come from... In any case, there is something very shady about the whole project. If people want to use Chrome, let them use Chrome, but please let's not start making IE pretend it's Chrome (or was it the other way around?). How on earth are corporate IT support people supposed to deal with requests for help from non-technical people once we start down that path?