3 ms·
That's not necessarily true. There are people, like myself, who often don't have a dog in the fight except that I look closely and skeptically at the tools and
by Enginerrrd 6y ago
That's not necessarily true. There are people, like myself, who often don't have a dog in the fight except that I look closely and skeptically at the tools and tactics being utilized and frequently ask myself: "Ok, but what if this were used in another way, or by the opposite side?" If the answer is that it's bad, then the means are objectively bad, and I oppose the use of those means.
This, in a sense is itself a political stance, but its not that hard to learn to distance yourself from the immediate emotions of politics. Particularly when I started to see how ubiquitous the weaoponization of anger has become in the modern era.
- Craighead 6y agoYou're stripping nuance and treating highly complicated situations like simple logical propositions thinking that inductive logic and reversing statements can attain an elevated understanding of the situation. In function you remain disconnected via privilege to the majority of implications of said issue, and self soothe by pretending that if others only had your level of enlightened understanding then there would be no issue.