3 ms·
Read the thread carefully. The vpn part was shown to be normal, not the firewall. The original problem was with the firewall, there were only passing mentions
by politelemon 6y ago
Read the thread carefully. The vpn part was shown to be normal, not the firewall.
The original problem was with the firewall, there were only passing mentions of the vpn which op tested.
Also problematic, the op released no data. Whether that works for you depends on your pov.
- duskwuff 6y agoThe "firewall" was Little Snitch -- which was implemented using a framework intended for per-application VPNs.
- webmobdev 6y agoNot just "Little Snitch", all Firewalls that had their own kernel extensions. With macOS Big Sur, Apple started insisting that thry have built specific API's for firewall softwares, and every firewall app had to use only that, and their custom kernel extensions won't be allowed. But Apple's API are ofcourse designed to allow it bypass their whitelisted softwares. More here: https://medium.com/tripmode/apple-started-hiding-the-traffic-of-its-own-mac-apps-9dc83c5a9c5b https://medium.com/tripmode/apple-started-hiding-the-traffic...