whataboutisms aside... They really don't need to provide 'evidence'. They have decided they don't want them as a customer. Just like a bakery can decide they

whataboutisms aside... They really don't need to provide 'evidence'. They have decided they don't want them as a customer. Just like a bakery can decide they don't want to make a gay wedding cake... edit: judging from the down vote, I'm guessing that explanation didn't sit well - perhaps this is better: "parler is just not worth the aggravation" - they are likely to be a minuscule revenue source that requires constant monitoring to make sure we not facing any liability, as well as potentially pissing off our existing clients. Therefore, its in our best interests just not to bother with them.