4 ms·
Except the interface which has been designed for touch interfaces without having any touch capability on the Mac, for the sake of "design unity" bullshit. You c
by systemvoltage 6y ago
Except the interface which has been designed for touch interfaces without having any touch capability on the Mac, for the sake of "design unity" bullshit. You can't have M1 without macOS Big Sur.
Not only on macOS, but generally the entire web is mobile-first and desktop-last philosophy.
- nicbou 6y agoI like Big Sur. Everything works just as well with the mouse as before. They made many quality of life improvements to the touch bar, and didn't mess with the other things. What exactly was made worse by it?
- systemvoltage 6y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25072644 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25072644 Instead of repeating same things over, there has been plenty of discussion on HN about macOS big sur design changes.
- user-the-name 6y agoDo you not have opinions on your own that you can express?
- valuearb 6y agoBlatantly false assertion. No touch design changes in Big Sur, confirmed by Hair Force One.
- systemvoltage 6y agoThe following explains and illustrates the problems with macOS and how they've shoehorned design changes that do not belong to Desktop environments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXG5REBi2fo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXG5REBi2fo
- valuearb 6y agoNo, it’s a rant with little to no factual support and an entire lack of perspective. Again, there is no evidence any Big Sur UI changes were to support touch screens. Bigger button areas make computers easier to use, just as bigger tap areas make mobile devices easier to use.
- systemvoltage 6y agoWhat kind of evidence are you seeking?
- valuearb 6y agoWhat kinds are you offering, because so far I’ve seen none but supposition.