That's true, but this is also an attempt to a moral question with a pragmatic empirical answer. The problem with this is the data can always change. How would

That's true, but this is also an attempt to a moral question with a pragmatic empirical answer. The problem with this is the data can always change. How would your opinion change if that correlation were found to disappear in the coming decades? Or if it actually began to reverse (for example as populations shift to being more urban where kids are expensive and access to assisted reproduction depends on wealth)?