Here's a case between Uber and a blind person [0]. TLDR: - Someone is suing Uber for discrimination because drivers didn't allow the person's guide dog in the

Here's a case between Uber and a blind person [0]. TLDR: - Someone is suing Uber for discrimination because drivers didn't allow the person's guide dog in the car. - Uber's terms state users can't sue Uber and must go through Uber's arbitration process - Uber's terms were presented in the "By continuing you agree to these terms" fashion - Person claimed they never agreed to arbitration and that they should be allowed to sue Uber, and a state court agreed > But the broader impact of the ruling is to put companies on notice that they can't bind users to restrictive terms merely by linking to those terms somewhere in a site or app's registration process. In order to create a legally binding contract, a tech company has actually put the terms in front of the user and get them to affirmatively agree to them. [0] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/01/court-says-uber-cant-hold-users-to-terms-they-probably-didnt-read/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/01/court-says-uber-...