4 ms·
As other commenters already pointed out, you're only accounting for price and not distributions. The actual average annual return over the past 10 years is abou
by fractionalhare 6y ago
As other commenters already pointed out, you're only accounting for price and not distributions. The actual average annual return over the past 10 years is about 6%, and since inception is about 7%. [1] [2] That far exceeds the 15% price return spread over 24 years.
A 7% average annual return over 24 years is not necessarily bad. On an absolute average basis that trails the market by 3%. [3] That return could still be legitimately superior to investing in SPY,
depending on risk goals, if its volatility and beta exposure is sufficiently low that it beats SPY on a risk-adjusted basis. Then you may even be able to beat the S&P on a total basis, safely, with leverage, depending on the volatility ratio.
Therefore the point you're trying to make would be better construed with an analysis of the beta, volatility and Sharpe of GMWAX. By definition the beta of SPY is 1, and the historical Sharpe is around 0.72. It's correlation with the market is about 1 and it has (again, almost by definition), 0 alpha.
GMWAX has close to total correlation with the market, with a beta of 1.02 and negative alpha less than that of SPY. It has a Sharpe ratio of only 0.34. That means this GMO asset allocation fund is not beating the market, even on a risk adjusted basis. Moreover the explicit mandate of the fund, to avoid market downturns but otherwise track the market's upswings, is not being met. It is both underperforming the market and highly correlated with the market.
1. https://www.schwab.com/public/schwab/investing/investment_help/investment_research/mutual_fund_research/mutual_funds.html?path=%2FProspect%2FResearch%2Fmutualfunds%2Fperformance.asp%3Fsymbol%3DGMWAX https://www.schwab.com/public/schwab/investing/investment_he...
2. https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/gmwax/performance https://www.morningstar.com/funds/xnas/gmwax/performance
3. https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/spy/risk https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/spy/risk
- ProjectArcturis 6y agoSo you would agree with my conclusion that GMO are worthless as advisors?
- fractionalhare 6y agoI realize this is going to sound pretty milquetoast, but: I wouldn't use words like "worthless". Predicting the future is complicated and I think GMO understands the fundamentals and macroeconomics very well. They are directionally correct most of the time and for the right reasons, so I'll listen to what they have to say. But I also don't think their predictions have sufficiently precise timing to beat the market. I agree with the thrust of your point, and I probably wouldn't invest my money with them. I think of GMO a lot like AQR in that sense.