> Private companies' interest should have little, if any, control over the ability of the public to speak This is the back door to authoritarianism. This basic

> Private companies' interest should have little, if any, control over the ability of the public to speak This is the back door to authoritarianism. This basic premise would allow the government to reach in and force companies to associate against their will. This power will be abused. > Speech without a platform isn't speech at all This is utter nonsense. By this logic, speech without access to a bullhorn or an editorial board isn’t speech at all. You have a right to speak without being prosecuted by the government. Pretending that you have a right to a Twitter account or an equivalent thereof is both silly, it’s incredibly entitled.