5 ms·

Hancock is a lack-talent idiot. It takes real skill to be a worse secretary of health than both Hunt and Lansley, but he's somehow managed it. He'll say whatev

by DanBC 6y ago

Hancock is a lack-talent idiot. It takes real skill to be a worse secretary of health than both Hunt and Lansley, but he's somehow managed it. He'll say whatever he thinks is popular at the time. Here he is calling for tighter regulation of social media: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/internet-laws-social-media-child-safety-terrorism-facebook-twitter-matt-hancock-a8360081.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/internet-laws... > New laws will be introduced aimed at tackling the internet “wild west” and making Britain the “safest place in the world” to be online, the culture secretary has said. > The largest social media companies could be fined billions of pounds if they do not take steps to protect users, Matt Hancock warned. > A new code of practice to tackle online bullying, stricter age verification requirements, and a regular internet safety transparency report to keep tabs on online abuse could also be included in new legislation. > Measures to tackle online harm could be funded through an industry-wide levy on firms such Facebook and Twitter.

jackjeff 6y ago
Nice to see he’s got some free time. It’s not like the Pandemic is out of control and should keep him busy... oh wait.
- notassigned 6y ago
  It's not...
sockjuice 6y ago
He's also a very strange man aside from that. For example, have you seen that video of him standing uncomfortably close to a lady he's being interviewed with, and staring at her? Weird as fuck.
- DanBC 6y ago
  Yes. Here's a twitter thread of him being odd. https://twitter.com/Emcharlotte10/status/1341334691035623425 https://twitter.com/Emcharlotte10/status/1341334691035623425
Silhouette 6y ago
The fundamental problem with the regulatory environment in the UK, as far as I can tell, is that both the big parties have been authoritarian on security and technology issues when in power, but neither appears to have a deep understanding of how modern technology works and the moral issues it raises. Consequently, in this field more than most, policies are set almost entirely for political expediency and appearances, rather than because they will achieve any other form of positive result. This is how we get conflicting positions, such as "we value security and want the UK to be the safest place in the world to be online", but also "we want our police and security services to be able to access any online communications". The handling of social media has often been similar. Apparently we are a democracy that values free speech, yet we also want the social media companies to use unspecified technology that they are assumed to have available to identify and block harmful content, for whatever definition of "harmful" is politically convenient at the time. A recurring theme is being seen to object to negative consequences of modern technology but without ever taking a clear stance or positive action for which they could be held responsible if it has other negative consequences of its own. It's the epitome of trying to have a cake and eat it, instead dumping the hard questions on the big tech firms. Those firms make good targets politically because obviously they do have some real problems, so a lot of people will be fine with blaming them for the evils of the tech world and won't have much sympathy for anything bad that happens to them.
timellis-smith 6y ago
I really thought that HN was a place where logical arguments were supposed to be conducted NOT unsubstantiated ad-hominem attacks. I really can't believe this comment is the top-rated one.
- timellis-smith 6y ago
  Mr Hancock, a former culture secretary, told BBC One's Andrew Marr Show. I would hardly say that this counts as free time, and I would argue keeping up with the news is the job of a government minister.

by DanBC 6y ago

jackjeff 6y ago

Nice to see he’s got some free time. It’s not like the Pandemic is out of control and should keep him busy... oh wait.

notassigned 6y ago
It's not...

sockjuice 6y ago

He's also a very strange man aside from that. For example, have you seen that video of him standing uncomfortably close to a lady he's being interviewed with, and staring at her? Weird as fuck.

DanBC 6y ago
Yes. Here's a twitter thread of him being odd. https://twitter.com/Emcharlotte10/status/1341334691035623425 https://twitter.com/Emcharlotte10/status/1341334691035623425

Silhouette 6y ago

The fundamental problem with the regulatory environment in the UK, as far as I can tell, is that both the big parties have been authoritarian on security and technology issues when in power, but neither appears to have a deep understanding of how modern technology works and the moral issues it raises. Consequently, in this field more than most, policies are set almost entirely for political expediency and appearances, rather than because they will achieve any other form of positive result. This is how we get conflicting positions, such as "we value security and want the UK to be the safest place in the world to be online", but also "we want our police and security services to be able to access any online communications". The handling of social media has often been similar. Apparently we are a democracy that values free speech, yet we also want the social media companies to use unspecified technology that they are assumed to have available to identify and block harmful content, for whatever definition of "harmful" is politically convenient at the time. A recurring theme is being seen to object to negative consequences of modern technology but without ever taking a clear stance or positive action for which they could be held responsible if it has other negative consequences of its own. It's the epitome of trying to have a cake and eat it, instead dumping the hard questions on the big tech firms. Those firms make good targets politically because obviously they do have some real problems, so a lot of people will be fine with blaming them for the evils of the tech world and won't have much sympathy for anything bad that happens to them.

timellis-smith 6y ago

I really thought that HN was a place where logical arguments were supposed to be conducted NOT unsubstantiated ad-hominem attacks. I really can't believe this comment is the top-rated one.

timellis-smith 6y ago
Mr Hancock, a former culture secretary, told BBC One's Andrew Marr Show. I would hardly say that this counts as free time, and I would argue keeping up with the news is the job of a government minister.