4 ms·
Or, man up and recognize that Twitter can ban whomever they want. They are not bound by the 1st amendment (at least in the American context).
by sanp 6y ago
Or, man up and recognize that Twitter can ban whomever they want. They are not bound by the 1st amendment (at least in the American context).
- RamRodification 6y agoWithout weighing in on the actual alternatives... Your comment comes off a bit weird to me because that's what bondarchuck is saying he would rather not have. Yet you present it as a new (to the discussion) option. It makes the conversation kind of go like this: Him: I would much rather we have A so that we didn't need B You: Or, we could have this thing B
- nilkn 6y agoI think it’s pretty unlikely social media companies will continue to have total control over public discourse. There’s already some legal precedent that the Supreme Court views Twitter and Facebook as public squares. See Packingham v. North Carolina from 2017, for example. I wouldn’t be surprised at all to see an escalation of this viewpoint soon.