5 ms·
I was only pointing out the context and that the first sentence is a rather obvious tell that it is part two of a series and should not be interpreted literally
by Jon_Lowtek 6y ago
I was only pointing out the context and that the first sentence is a rather obvious tell that it is part two of a series and should not be interpreted literally.
- jacquesm 6y agoI have a pretty simple rule for evaluating articles: if not indicated otherwise I assume they stand on their own and that the article writer means what they say. It's on them to communicate any circumstances that are required to be able to read the article, at a minimum a link should be provided to such context if it is available. Just read this thread and see how many people are wrong-footed by the article.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Jon_Lowtek 6y ago> It's on them Honestly, i think your reaction to having an assumption collapse is rather terrible