2 ms·
Usually when you build a clone, you base it on fixing the problems of the original? What problems in wikipedia could a clone possibly fix since the main issues
by canofbars 6y ago
Usually when you build a clone, you base it on fixing the problems of the original? What problems in wikipedia could a clone possibly fix since the main issues with wikipedia is getting people to agree on what should be included and I don't see how that could be solved.
- kubanczyk 6y agoFor example, a fork could make all articles into rabbit holes like: - really simple and short article - expanded version of the same article - even more expanded version - ... With an easy (contextual!) navigation up and down the stack. The benefit would be faster learning. The initial levels would be clearly marked that they contain simplifications to the point of being half-truths and the version that is 100% "honest" would be also clearly marked. (For the cases when the truth is so complex that it becomes clearly anti-educational. I don't mean controversial/political topics.)