4 ms·
This is a straw man argument. We’re not discussing whether a private company should be allowed to have a TOS or control their TOS. We are discussing if a privat
by zadokshi 6y ago
This is a straw man argument. We’re not discussing whether a private company should be allowed to have a TOS or control their TOS. We are discussing if a privately owned public communication platform used by the majority of a population should be able to control speech. Also at stake is if a large corporation should be able to have TOS that are anti competitive. (I.E. have TOS that in effect stifle competition)
- jordanbeiber 6y agoThe president could for example call to a press conference. The internet is still rather open - parler could start a web site or give out a magazine. The possible venues of free speech are numerous.