3 ms·

I’m confused - that article is from 2006 - how can it be used to debunk a 2017 study?

• Kim_Bruning 6y ago
  Apologies, It's from 2006 even. I'm clearly getting old. The reason it can be used to debunk the 2017 study is because said study is working with an old idea that already existed in 2006. Aaron Swartz posits that at the very least you should not discount the importance of the long tail.
  • jjcon 6y ago
    > posits that at the very least you should not discount the importance of the long tail. thats not a debunking