3 ms·
> when the crowd-based articles are substantially revised. You literally just had to keep reading to find the cases where they do show bias
by jjcon 6y ago
> when the crowd-based articles are substantially revised.
You literally just had to keep reading to find the cases where they do show bias
- brendoelfrendo 6y agoThat's just saying that highly-trafficked, highly-edited articles are going to be less biased than articles with fewer contributors or sources. That... just makes sense, to me; the more visible or relevant an article, the more people (and potentially experts) will weigh in, and the more crowd consensus will drive out the more blatant biases.
- arp242 6y agoIt also mentions there a bias in both directions, depending on the topic. Plus, it only considers US viewpoints/political alignments, and not Canadian, British, Australian, or other countries.