4 ms·
It seems that progressive/interlacing techniques increase the final size. https://blog.codinghorror.com/progressive-image-rendering/ https://blog.codinghorror.c
by cl0ckt0wer 6y ago
It seems that progressive/interlacing techniques increase the final size. https://blog.codinghorror.com/progressive-image-rendering/ https://blog.codinghorror.com/progressive-image-rendering/
- ghusbands 6y agoIt seems likely that that blog post is wrong in that detail, given that pretty much everyone else says that making JPGs progressive reduces the file size.
- lucb1e 6y agoAll I know (if I remember correctly, I'm fairly certain but won't rule out that I'm mixing things up) is that GIMP has a toggle for it and when it's enabled, it sometimes saves a tiny amount but never seems to get larger. Perhaps the toggle doesn't do what it says on the tin?