2 ms·
The problem is not that Parler only had violent posts -- obviously that is untrue. The problem is that Parler seemed to consider facilitating violent posts as a
by aluminum96 6y ago
The problem is not that Parler only had violent posts -- obviously that is untrue. The problem is that Parler seemed to consider facilitating violent posts as a primary purpose, if their unwillingness to remove them is any indication.
- shripadk 6y agoI just gave you proof of Twitters unwillingness to remove posts on their platform. I have reported them all months ago. None of them have been removed. There are plenty like this. As long as it suits the left-wing narrative it will be protected. And don't even get me started on Facebook, Amazon and Instagram. These websites have promoted anti-Hindu content for years now. Keep reporting accounts and none of them are removed. It requires a massive boycott movement to get them to remove hate content. Take this for example: https://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/news/amazon-india-hindu-symbols-underwear-briefs-doormat-listings-removed-pulled-down-boycott-2323612 https://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/news/amazon-india-hindu-sy... "Amazon Takes Down Underwear, Doormat Listings With Hindu Symbols After India Backlash" Why do they need a backlash to remove something that is obviously egregious?