2 ms·
Perhaps it’s more nuanced than my understanding, but sites/companies are sheltered from liability for unprotected (illegal) speech posted by users — that is/wa
by skygazer 6y ago
Perhaps it’s more nuanced than my understanding, but sites/companies are sheltered from liability for unprotected (illegal) speech posted by users — that is/was the whole point of the communications decency act section 230. Lawsuits may fly, but would be quickly dismissed.
Maybe if your business existed solely to host, or encouraged unprotected speech (threats, fraud, defamation) you’d find your company in trouble.
- whatsmyusername 6y agoAmusingly, if section 230 was repealed, Cheeto would be banned instantly. No way Twitter would want to be liable for his incitement. I’d say people (using the term loosely) in his sphere should think of that, but that would require a level of self awareness that’s clearly lacking.