4 ms·
> The ecosystem is vibrant, healthy, and will keep growing. I'm in favour of it, and hope it does well. But at the same time, constant growth itself doesn't me
by jamesrcole 6y ago
> The ecosystem is vibrant, healthy, and will keep growing.
I'm in favour of it, and hope it does well. But at the same time, constant growth itself doesn't mean that much.
There's a big difference between slow constant growth and explosive constant growth. Something can constantly grow yet still remain something most people have never heard of. I think Linux on the desktop is a reasonable example of this.
The alternatives will likely be constantly growing as well.
> in my mind there will eventually be a tipping point
it's going to be difficult to compete against YouTube... there has to be some reason why people use it instead of YouTube.
- kitotik 6y agoWhy does it need to compete with YouTube? Is it really a zerosum situation?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- jamesrcole 6y agoIt doesn’t need to. But obviously there are people who want it to be at least fairly well used. The value of such a thing has a lot to do with how many people use it and how much content there is. You need users to give incentive for people to upload content. And you need content to incentivize new users.
- monopoledance 6y agoI disagree. Value here is a matter of quality, not quantity, and impact on humanity's welfare. Most "network-effect successful" networks have a low and decreasing signal-noise ratio, they merely produce unqualified "content" for the most part. Tech diversity in itself is a value, even if the niche players never leave the niche for the most part. Diversity allows for adaptability in a changing environment/crisis. I believe the mass social network epoche is about to end, as the advertisement/influence ecosystem is eating up its island's last trees. The dream of the global internet failed, for reasons we can't fix. ActivityPub is much better fitting a fragmented network.
- riffic 6y agoYou know, Linux in general is probably the best example of this. Its success doesn't need to be defined by the desktop. When people bring up desktop Linux, I always bring up that Linux impacts 100% of internet users because of its presence running web applications, and it impacts however many people who use Android or other Linux devices (embedded/IoT). Automotive is even a huge sector these days.
- pjmlp 6y agoDepends on how one pats their back and the actual reality. Yes, Android runs on Linux, yet that is 100% meaningless for app developers targeting Android. Web developers don't care about what OS the browser is running on. Native Android developers have a Java Framework and Kotlin libraries to work with, which are completely unrelated to Linux. However they also have the NDK, one would say. Yes, indeed. So what are the public APIs? https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/stable_apis https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/stable_apis And recent versions will kill apps that try to be clever and access private APIs, https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2016/06/android-changes-for-ndk-developers.html https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2016/06/android-ch... https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2017/07/seccomp-filter-in-android-o.html https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2017/07/seccomp-fi... As for automotive, while Automotive Grade Linux is getting some love, it is still not an option for real time requirements.
- namibj 6y agoRT_PREEMPT is very much capable of real-time applications. Outside of control loops faster than a couple kHz, it's even suitable for hard real-time applications. But those issues aren't fixed with Linux, but rather with CPUs design for hard real-time usage.
- pjmlp 6y agoIndustry seems to think otherwise. That still isn't a match for something like INTEGRITY OS, vxWorks, QNX when human lives are at risk. Or why despite using an heavily modified Linux kernel as basis for Azure Sphere, Microsoft rather advocates Azure RTOS for real time tasks. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/internet-of-things/combining-azure-sphere-iot-security-with-azure-rtos-real-time/ba-p/1992869 https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/internet-of-things/co... Or why the Linux Foundation, ironically pushes Zephyr for such purposes, completely unrelated to Linux source code. https://www.zephyrproject.org/ https://www.zephyrproject.org/
- RMPR 6y ago> there has to be some reason why people use it instead of YouTube. I had non-technical people in my family asking me Youtube alternatives because they were afraid of censorship. I think the reasons are already there[0] but there are no "peertube marketing department" taking care of conversion. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_suspensions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_suspensions
- BlueTemplar 6y agoYouTubers have been complaining about YouTube for nearly a decade now : http://angryjoeshow.com/ajsa/forums/topic/10325-youtube-becoming-more-anti-user/?page=1 http://angryjoeshow.com/ajsa/forums/topic/10325-youtube-beco... http://angryjoeshow.com/ajsa/forums/topic/10553-youtube-copyright-claim-solution/?page=1 http://angryjoeshow.com/ajsa/forums/topic/10553-youtube-copy... https://web.archive.org/web/20200806101856/http://www.joueurdugrenier.fr/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=5229 https://web.archive.org/web/20200806101856/http://www.joueur... (fr) But in 2013 there were no real alternatives. This has started to change in the recent years.
- MeinBlutIstBlau 6y agoThat has me concerned that nutjob right wing conspiracy theorists are going to flock to PeerTube just as they did voat and parler. So long as they maintain their own stuff which is what I understand as to how this all works, thats fine. I just wouldn't want their stuff to pop up in other instances so that they're filtered out by default.