>That is a completely absurd false equivalence. Except it's not an equivalence at all. I'm simply saying (and evidently correctly at that), that your justifica

>That is a completely absurd false equivalence. Except it's not an equivalence at all. I'm simply saying (and evidently correctly at that), that your justification would also apply to this other situation. > It would be a dumb decision, as it would turn away a huge number of their customers, but it would be within their rights. Well, that's where I totally disagree. The vast, vast majority of customers wouldn't be in violation of it, so they have nothing to gain from switching and morality is at best an afterthought.