4 ms·
Question: Would this mean that Signal's backend would be prohibited from running on AWS? After all, it's almost assuredly the case that at least some Signal us
by dcolkitt 6y ago
Question: Would this mean that Signal's backend would be prohibited from running on AWS?
After all, it's almost assuredly the case that at least some Signal users are actively plotting violence. Yet end-to-end encryption by definition makes it impossible for Signal to identify that content.
- lostcolony 6y ago"Almost assuredly" is different than "obvious and blatantly and not being moderated". Obviously. You're making the same argument the government has made against encryption. Moderating a private conversation is obviously different than moderating a public one.
- amluto 6y agoSignal is essentially useless as a platform to recruit people for anything, legal or otherwise.
- shard972 6y agoBullshit, You have 0 proof of these statements
- CryptoGhost 6y agoBut then you have cases where people leak private group chats (either from bad opsec or insider jobs) and people face the ban hammer.
- root_axis 6y agoSignal isn't a social media platform it has no need for moderatation.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- NoSorryCannot 6y agoA signal conversation is not a public platform. It's the difference between sending a letter and sending a newsletter.