3 ms·
> and that is the sole purview of monopolies. No actually. According to the wikipedia definition on censorship, there is no requirement to be a monopoly, in o
by stale2002 6y ago
> and that is the sole purview of monopolies.
No actually. According to the wikipedia definition on censorship, there is no requirement to be a monopoly, in order for a private business to engage in censorship.
Instead, according to the actual definition of censorship, censorship is any sort of "suppression of speech, public communication, or other information", and private, non-monopolies can absolutely engage in censorship.
You are simply incorrect about what the definition of censorship is. The actual definitions, that are all over the place, do not require a monopoly.
- dleslie 6y agoA company cannot fully suppress communications if it does not control the communications medium. There is no company which has a total monopoly on any form of communications in the USA. Material is not effectively made unavailable without total suppression.