3 ms·

So, help the multibillionaires, then?

• sol_invictus 6y ago
  No? It means that if you support CHAZ/CHOP and condemn the Capitol events then youre a partisan hack. Either you want peace and prosperity or you don’t. You can’t cherry-pick your stance towards law based on who’s breaking it. There’s nothing hard to understand about it, but then again people love to play dumb in questions like these. I don’t understand it to be honest.
  • loopz 6y ago
    This is just too generic a complaint.
    • sol_invictus 6y ago
      When you have no arguments, divert.
      • deleted 6y ago
        [deleted]
      • loopz 6y ago
        With whataboutism, everything is OK then, as you can always find something worse to confirm your bias. Besides, I find it disingenious to equate lies about election fraud without evidence leading to riot and assault on core democratic process, and people fighting/defending the right not to be assaulted and killed by armed police. But that argument is besides the point of this issue.
        • sol_invictus 6y ago
          You are confused; I didn't give Trumpistas a pass, I accused the other side of having double standards. Ergo, not whataboutism. You are well within your right BTW to find the comparison disingenious. I find it too. However, I'm not interested in giving one group of people power to do whatever they want without legal repercussions and enforce it on another group of people. Should the law not be equal to all?
          • loopz 6y ago
            It's all different people, groups and situations, but I acknowledge your point.
            • sol_invictus 6y ago
              Thank you for ending this exchange on a positive note.