An interesting excerpt from a recent Fox News interview with Parler's Chief Policy Officer[1]: Just watching a Fox News interview with the Parler Chief Policy

An interesting excerpt from a recent Fox News interview with Parler's Chief Policy Officer[1]: Just watching a Fox News interview with the Parler Chief Policy Officer and she said "People seem to want [tech companies] to 'moderate' as they call it, content on these platforms but that would require 24/7 surveillance and I don't think that is consistent with the principles of America" For context, she seemed quite non-technical but I thought it was an interesting insight into how systems with good intentions can be miscontrued (willingly or accidentally). The chyron ironically says "Parler: We will not surveil innocent people" at one point. I guess you'd need to rely on user reports to claim that but you're definitely going to end up with false reports for sure. On a side note, how could Parler ever operate if Trump pulled Section 230? Wouldn't they instantly be considered culpable (as would every other company) for their users content? It seems like a lose-lose threat. [1]: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MNIxatQ0fKU https://youtube.com/watch?v=MNIxatQ0fKU