>in 17XX, the mountain top in Colorado (a) wasn't even a part of the country Which is relevant, since Parlor and other small sites may not have servers on the

>in 17XX, the mountain top in Colorado (a) wasn't even a part of the country Which is relevant, since Parlor and other small sites may not have servers on the country due to the big corporation squashing them. >even if it was, remained several thousand miles of arduous cross-country travel from the entire population of the newly emerging state. Exactly like how there's no promises now that small blogs will be indexed, will be cancelled with AMP, may outright be banned by ISPs and CDNs, etc. >People would almost certainly die en route to hear your pontifications. Packets would almost certainly "die" en route as well due to what's laid out above. >There's zero comparison with a browser address bar. Wrong, it's really apt. Thanks for fleshing it out actually. So bring it forward now like I originally stated: BLM and other leftists can protest in areas that are not high traffic roads, freeways, main streets, federal courthouses, etc. They can protest in the Mojave desert, they won't be censored there. The can all drive there easily, by no means dangerous. Probably safer than the "town square" in many of the Democrat ran cities. >And btw, "kicked your teeth in" as a description of that thread exchange seems like a great reason to avoid further interaction with you. You admit defeat and don't have a response, that's fine. >spoonjim's comment was downvoted Can't have any wrongthink now can we. >and incidentally wrong No it wasn't, it was 100% right, and you didn't have a response.