3 ms·
You claim that they’re ignoring facts, but provide no facts of your own beyond “some companies use it in production,” which is undoubtably also true of Haskell.
by travv0 6y ago
You claim that they’re ignoring facts, but provide no facts of your own beyond “some companies use it in production,” which is undoubtably also true of Haskell.
- iLemming 6y ago> but provide no facts - more active podcasts: https://www.fpcasts.com/ https://www.fpcasts.com/ - more conferences: https://purelyfunctional.tv/functional-programming-conferences/ https://purelyfunctional.tv/functional-programming-conferenc... - more books: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Clojure https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Clojure - more companies: https://clojure.org/community/companies https://clojure.org/community/companies - more jobs: https://www.google.com/search?q=functional+programming+jobs https://www.google.com/search?q=functional+programming+jobs I've maintained an active interest in FP languages over the past several years. I'm not arguing here about the merits of choosing Haskell over Clojure, etc., or about other blogpost opinions (I'm afraid I have to disagree with many of them). I'm merely sharing what I know about the current state of FP in the industry.