3 ms·
I used ImageMagick [0] just now to create a couple test images. magick testimage.png testimage.avif magick testimage.png -quality 60 testimage60.avif [0]
by devadvance 6y ago
I used ImageMagick [0] just now to create a couple test images.
magick testimage.png testimage.avif
magick testimage.png -quality 60 testimage60.avif
[0] https://imagemagick.org/script/magick.php https://imagemagick.org/script/magick.php
- shmerl 6y agoImagemagick that's packaged in Debian doesn't have avif support unfortunately. They somehow split between version 6 and version 7 which is confusing, because both are progressing in parallel but they don't have feature parity. I can try getting version 7.
- devadvance 6y agoAh, I didn't realize that! Looking at this [0] issue thread, it seems like the minimum version with AVIF support is v7.0.25. The suggestion to use Docker in that thread might be useful for you as well, if you are interested in a couple quick tests and are already set up for containers. [0] https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/1432#issuecomment-750679801 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/1432#issue...
- canofbars 6y agoI wouldn't recommend using anything in the debian repos if you want a feature newer than 5 years old.
- shmerl 6y agoI don't have this problem normally, because I'm using Debian testing, not Debian stable. There is a major difference. Also, the difference between imagemagick 6 and 7 isn't simply about being an older version.
- Plebious 6y agoArch Linux, AUR, etc, tryuck Plebian!
- ncmncm 6y agoAre you talking about "stable" repos? Do you know anyone who sticks to those, for personal use? (A lot of people use "testing" for reasons I have not been able to comprehend. The main difference from "unstable" is it takes a minimum of 2 weeks for fixes to show up in "testing". Or did, last I checked.)
- shmerl 6y agoBreakage happens less in testing. That's the main reason I'm using it vs Sid.