> It is difficult to see what the problem is. No one seems to be angry that Rubert Murdoch, owner of Fox News, gets to decide who is a host/anchor and who isn'

> It is difficult to see what the problem is. No one seems to be angry that Rubert Murdoch, owner of Fox News, gets to decide who is a host/anchor and who isn't, who is a guest that is interviewed and who isn't, who goes on air and who doesn't, etc. If Fox New (and CNN, OANN, etc) get to decide who to broadcast or not, I'm not sure what's so special about Twitter as a platform deciding as well. Arguing the contra: if Twitter "must" allow Trump, shouldn't Fox News "have to" allow (e.g.) Noam Chomsky to have his own show?