> He's still able to speak Does not matter. This is still the definition of censorship, according to the relevant authorities on definitions of words. Basica

> He's still able to speak Does not matter. This is still the definition of censorship, according to the relevant authorities on definitions of words. Basically every definition that you find will agree with me that private companies can censor people. > should be able to force Who said anything about force? I am just saying that private companies can censor people, according to basically every definition of the word. You can have whatever opinions that you want on if censorship is good or bad.