2 ms·
It doesn't produce portable projects. If all you wanted was Linux (or often "Ubuntu compatible") then why not just have a raw Makefile? It doesn't log what it
by knorker 6y ago
It doesn't produce portable projects. If all you wanted was Linux (or often "Ubuntu compatible") then why not just have a raw Makefile?
It doesn't log what it attempted, or why it failed.
It can't find out how to link binaries (always awesome to set up som execsnoop (because no logs, remember) only to see that it tries to link with "-llibfoo". In what world could that be correct?. And again it doesn't log how and why it chose that)
I could go on, but it's too much for a comment field.