Given the seditious aspect to it off directly attacking a body of government. It seems different under US law compared with arson/vandalism that has most charac

Given the seditious aspect to it off directly attacking a body of government. It seems different under US law compared with arson/vandalism that has most characterised the protests around US cities. I think it would be condemned equally no matter who tried it. It’s the beginning of an end game scenario of democracy... so it makes sense it is viewed so harshly