3 ms·
That was kind of the point of the article — the precedent once set is hard to limit to those with press offices. There was no argument with the particular actio
by ballenf 6y ago
That was kind of the point of the article — the precedent once set is hard to limit to those with press offices. There was no argument with the particular action in this case.
- jmull 6y agoI wonder what the precedent is supposed be here? Twitter and facebook have been banning people all along, for all kinds of reasons. I thought the precedent set for Trump was the high level of leeway given to a government leader compared to regular people. I think if he weren’t the President he would have had more tweets removed and been suspended earlier and more often.