3 ms·
This is interesting. I work on a large medicine software, and after 10 years of development in C++, we switched to C# about two years ago. Overall, my feeling i
by greyman 18y ago
This is interesting. I work on a large medicine software, and after 10 years of development in C++, we switched to C# about two years ago. Overall, my feeling is that the development process is quicker and the libraries support (.NET) was also improvement, along with the IDE (Visual Studion 8). To sum it up, the whole experience have been positive.
Of course, our product is tied to Windows platform. But living with this restriction, I'd say C# is a good choice.
- mojuba 18y agoWhich means, you probably never really needed C++. No doubt, Visual Studio shines and is probably unbeatable as an IDE. No doubt, .NET will become more and more solid as they are trying to catch up with Java VM in performance and robustness. But unfortunately C#, the language itself, is restrictive and is trying to protect the programmer from him/herself, same way as Java and Python.