3 ms·
> MAD basically assures no hot war Wait, wait, wait. That's not a fact, and in fact a known piece of propaganda. First. Even, an all out nuclear exchange in
by baybal2 6y ago
> MAD basically assures no hot war
Wait, wait, wait.
That's not a fact, and in fact a known piece of propaganda.
First. Even, an all out nuclear exchange in between superpowers, in an unrealistic scenario without counterstrikes, and zero nuclear attrition, a superpower like US, Russia, or China will "only" loose a low single digits of population.
Communist countries not only wouldn't hesitate to do so, but have a history doing that to themselves.
USSR killed at a minimum 10% of its own population with fully intentional punitive starvation. Mao did the same, and Pol Pot have beaten both.
Second. Even after a nuclear exchange, both superpowers would have at least a half of its military functioning, and very, very angry.
Third, after exhausting all nukes, and high-tech weaponry, both countries would proceed to a long, and exhausting conventional war, which will kill way more people than any nukes can.
- mensetmanusman 6y agoAmerica has enough nukes to take out every population center in Asia before the day end tomorrow. It’s sad but true that nuclear power is so incredible that people haven’t dared move against it.
- baybal2 6y agoThat was not possible even with cold war number of missiles in service, let alone now.