> You don't have a point and the claims you've made are egregiously wrong. Here's a hint, 1967 >>>>> 365. You literally didn't contradict anything I said lingu

> You don't have a point and the claims you've made are egregiously wrong. Here's a hint, 1967 >>>>> 365. You literally didn't contradict anything I said linguistically or culturally (i.e. that China is _not_ some singular linguistical/cultural area), which was my point. So no I _do_ have a point and you yourself agreed with it. You made another point that the fact that China was unified more recently as an empire than Rome means they are somehow more legitimate. If that's your point, okay I understand your thinking. I don't agree with it (by that reasoning the British have a claim on a lot of the world's territory), but okay then that is your thinking.