3 ms·
Rather than merely lamenting that no one's mentioned OCaml, how about providing something specific about OCaml you think is relevant to contribute to the discus
by grzm 6y ago
Rather than merely lamenting that no one's mentioned OCaml, how about providing something specific about OCaml you think is relevant to contribute to the discussion?
- nix23 6y ago>Rather than merely lamenting Why not read for yourself then? https://ocaml.org/ https://ocaml.org/
- HelloNurse 6y agoFor example, pointers about how OCaml compares to Haskell weak spots: - Basic features (e.g. records, strings, portability) - Undocumented, fragmented and/or half baked libraries - Bizarre and inconvenient "advanced" syntax - Extravagant memory usage