4 ms·
Honestly, I feel like the success of Go has eaten some Haskell’s lunch. I used to use it when I was reaching for a native binary with near-C performance, but w
by dcolkitt 6y ago
Honestly, I feel like the success of Go has eaten some Haskell’s lunch.
I used to use it when I was reaching for a native binary with near-C performance, but wanted an easier to maintain, terser, GC language.
Nowadays that’s pretty much Go. But if the problem would benefit from a lot of higher-level, Haskells still a good choice, given Gos lack of generics.
- likeclockwork 6y agoD is my goto when I have similar requirements.