No the question is if twitter had a monopoly on private squared that almost anyone can access and peek into. They don't and there are dozens of alternatives. I

No the question is if twitter had a monopoly on private squared that almost anyone can access and peek into. They don't and there are dozens of alternatives. Its not a publicly owned square, that is obvious. It may be a publicly accessible square. Ultimately its right to kick people out for lighting dumpster fires, still seems perfectly reasonable if it were a private square that is pubolically accessible. That said, I could see civil suits could argue responsibility for keeping that square safe for guests(ie allowing ice to build up on the private but accessible square and someone slips and falls) But if twitter doesnt want someone there in its square, it should be free to kick them out if they arent a protected class, just like every private but publicly accessible business we patron.