3 ms·
> Having mail service to rural areas isn't uneconomical because nobody would offer the service for the right price, it's because nobody would pay the price it a
by ikt 6y ago
> Having mail service to rural areas isn't uneconomical because nobody would offer the service for the right price, it's because nobody would pay the price it actually costs
Or perhaps they would pay the cost but it's uneconomical to do so and having an uneconomical situation results in worse outcomes for a significant amount of the population?
I can't believe you're saying this when a enormous group of Americans have shown at the last election that they are clearly uneducated in the richest country in the world yet instead of attempting to fix that issue capitalism is exploiting them for profit.
> This is almost never even useful.
There are a lot of issues America could fix if you had more faith in your government.