3 ms·
I'm far more worried about the FDA and logistics than technical limitations. Even if you could make this fix in a day, it'll take months to get FDA approval, a
by JamesBarney 6y ago
I'm far more worried about the FDA and logistics than technical limitations.
Even if you could make this fix in a day, it'll take months to get FDA approval, and then you still have to manufacture and distribute it. And by that time the populous will have gotten immunity the old fashion way.
- dnautics 6y agoIndeed. And the likelihood of escape are worse the greater the infected population x time to new vaccine. I'm increasingly worried that covid-19 is the slow loris of viruses. Too slow and mild to warrant panic-mode measures (I don't mean lockdowns), just gonna be an annual millimation of the population.
- howlgarnish 6y agoAren't we in panic mode measures already? I'm not sure there's much more most countries can realistically implement even if there's a 10x more lethal variant.
- meddlepal 6y agoI think Parents point was that eventually we will have to give up on panic mode and accept deaths from this each year.
- the8472 6y agoDuring initial containment china welded apartments shut and organized essentials deliveries by dedicated couriers for each city block. And then there's the option of military-enforced cordons. There are multiple levels of panic left untapped.
- howlgarnish 6y agoThat's why I said "most countries", because in (say) the US the government couldn't pull that off even if they tried. (For one thing, it's hard to weld shut suburban housing.)
- nicoburns 6y agoPerhaps, but if the virus was as transmissible as sars-cov-2, but had a much higher fatality rate (say 60% like Ebola). Then you would get a lot more support for strict measures amongst the general population.
- dnautics 6y agoI said "not lockdowns". I meant things like "strip down the phase testing" etc. I see no evidence we are doing that.