3 ms·
It is too simplistic, heck, even for CPUs the executions are often in parallel, out of order, whatnot, depending on the type of task that needs to be performed.
by stingraycharles 6y ago
It is too simplistic, heck, even for CPUs the executions are often in parallel, out of order, whatnot, depending on the type of task that needs to be performed. The same is the case with the human brain.
I’d say that they probably took the simplest task possible and see how fast the human brain could do that and ended up with 30Hz. Seems like a very silly thing to me.
- socialdemocrat 6y agoNo it is based on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_rhythm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_rhythm The human brain obviously works in parallel but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have something akin to a clock frequency. There is a limit to how quickly signals can propagate through the brain.