Expropriation and war-production act type solutions were always sufficient incentives/threats. Once again, case law/legal theory just hasn't caught up yet. It

Expropriation and war-production act type solutions were always sufficient incentives/threats. Once again, case law/legal theory just hasn't caught up yet. It'd be interesting to see if today, a TV station says "We're disabling the emergency broadcast system to pre-empt our (either rational or irrational) fear of misuse." How long till fcc/govt mechanisms have the broadcast antenna turned off? Or the station seized, or whatever the solution is. Is the answer the same if, hypothetically, a foreign "influenced" station does the same thing as a war breaks out? Or, what if a station "ghosts" the system. Just turns it off without announcement? Apply the same questions to everything else you listed above. I presume (and hope) the pentagon knows these answers.