4 ms·
You're being quite glib if you're honestly pretending not to see the glaring subtext there. The intention is obviously to increase transparency in order to stam
by tenaciousDaniel 6y ago
You're being quite glib if you're honestly pretending not to see the glaring subtext there. The intention is obviously to increase transparency in order to stamp out unwanted opinions before they even spread.
- solipsism 6y agoYes. Unwanted opinions like "we should overthrow the will of the people using force".
- gotoeleven 6y agoYes I agree unwanted opinions are the worst only wanted opinions should be allowed.
- jlokier 6y agoIf an opinion doesn't spread because people decide not to spread it after transparency reveals who is paying for advertisements and how platform algorithms are deciding which opinions to promote, isn't that just better democracy? The Mozilla blog entry, subtext and all, does not say that they should decide what opinions are unwanted.