>> Their legal cases are rejected. They had 60+ chances to make a case, and couldn't... >> We're not even listening to them >> We're not debating anymore. I

>> Their legal cases are rejected. They had 60+ chances to make a case, and couldn't... >> We're not even listening to them >> We're not debating anymore. I'm not listening anymore because there IS no debate. 'Debate' is an exchange of ideas. This is basically a 'harangue' - and personally, I'm tired of it. No one has a 'right' to force people to listen to them. >> We just assume we're right. No, I assume they're wrong as the logic doesn't hold up. There is a difference. Personally, I think the election basically boiled down to 'rural' vs 'urban', but I'm sure there are other views. I can't force people to believe my views 'cuz I said so!' anymore then Trump can force me to believe him, 'cuz he said so!' >> Wouldn't you do the same? I don't recall doing the same when Bernie was written off by DNC, and there actually WAS evidence the DNC tilted things against him. edit: fix formatting